Estimación de la diferencia entre los diámetros mesiodistales de incisivos y molares deciduos con sus sucedáneos permanentes

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorMariaca, Paola Botero
dc.contributor.advisorGonzález A., Sandra
dc.contributor.advisorÁlvarez S., Gonzalo
dc.creatorMeneses, Dora Liliana
dc.creatorZapata Zapata, Eliana
dc.creatorBotero Mariaca, Paola
dc.creatorGonzález A., Sandra
dc.creatorÁlvarez S., Gonzalo
dc.creator.maildora.meneses@campusucc.edu.coes
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-19T22:21:46Z
dc.date.available2022-04-19T22:21:46Z
dc.date.issued2010-06-25
dc.descriptionObjetivo: Determinar la diferencia del tamaño entre los dientes deciduos y permanentes tanto en la zona anterior y posterior en un grupo de escolares de Medellín. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo longitudinal prospectivo en 139 modelo de escolares de la ciudad de Medellín; clase I esquelética seguidos longitudinalmente cada año desde los 6 hasta los 12 años de edad. De los 139 modelos con los criterios de inclusión se trabajaron con 53, 35 pertenecían niñas y 18 a niños que presentaran el primer modelo en dentición decidua completa y el último con dentición permanente completa; en los cuales se determinó el espacio de leeway y pasivo incisivo. Resultados: Se encontró un espacio de leeway positivo inferior (3.622 mm) mayor que el superior (1.556 mm); mientras el pasivo incisivo fue negativamente mayor en el superior (-7.884 mm) que el inferior (-5.38 6mm). En seis pacientes el espacio de leeway fue negativo entre -1.582 a -3.184 mm para el arco inferior y superior respectivamente. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre sexos, sin embargo las niñas presentaron un espacio de leeway y pasivo incisivo ligeramente mayores. Conclusiones: Las medidas normales para un grupo étnico no deben ser consideradas normales para otro grupo y cada uno debe ser tratado acuerdo a sus propias características.es
dc.format.extent19 p.es
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMeneses, D. L., Zapata Zapata, E., Botero Mariaca, P., González A., S. y Álvarez S. (2010). Estimación de la diferencia entre los diámetros mesiodistales de incisivos y molares deciduos con sus sucedáneos permanentes. [Tesis de pregrado, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia]. Repositorio Institucional UCC. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/44586es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/44586
dc.publisherUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Odontología, Medellín y Envigadoes
dc.publisher.departmentMedellínes
dc.publisher.programOdontologíaes
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesses
dc.rights.licenseAtribuciónes
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGianelly AA. Leeway space and the resolution of crowding in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod. 1995 Sep;1(3):188-194.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBAUME LJ. Physiological tooth migration and its significance for the development of occlusion. I. The biogenetic course of the deciduous dentition. J. Dent. Res. 1950 Abr;29(2):123-132es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder J, Nowak A. Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Abr;111(4):401-409.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMoorrees CF, Chadha JM. Available space for the incisors during dental development--a growth study based on physiologic age. Angle Orthod. 1965 Ene;35:12-22.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBAUME LJ. Physiological tooth migration and its significance for the development of occlusion; the biogenesis of accessional dentition. J. Dent. Res. 1950 Jun;29(3):331-337es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBAUME LJ. Physiological tooth migration and its significance for the development of occlusion; the biogenesis of overbite. J. Dent. Res. 1950 Ago;29(4):440-447es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationClinch LM. A longitudinal study of the mediodistal crown diameters of thedeciduous teeth and their permanent successors. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29(29):i75-i81.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBuwembo W, Luboga S. Moyer’s method of mixed dentition analysis: a meta-analysis. Afr Health Sci. 2004 Abr;4(1):63-66.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNgan P, Alkire RG, Fields H Jr. Management of space problems in the primary and mixed dentitions. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Sep;130(9):1330-1339es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMoorrees CFA. The dentition of the growing child; a longitudinal study of dental development between 3 and 18 years of age. Cambridge: Harvard University; 1959.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMoorrees CF. Dental development--a growth study based on tooth eruption as a measure of physiologic age. Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc. 1964;40:92-106.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationKeski-Nisula K, Lehto R, Lusa V, Keski-Nisula L, Varrela J. Occurrence of malocclusion and need of orthodontic treatment in early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Dic;124(6):631-638es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMayne WR. Serial extraction--orthodontics at the crossroads. Dent. Clin. North Am. 1968 Jul;:341-362es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMayne WR. Serial extraction--orthodontics at the crossroads. Dent. Clin. North Am. 1968 Jul;:341-362es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDale JG, Brandt S. Dr. Jack G. Dale on serial extraction. J Clin Orthod. 1976 Ene;10(1):44-60.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRepublica de Colombia Ministerio de Salud. Resolucion no 008430 de 1993. 1993 Oct 4es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Abdallah EM, Fernandez Garcia A. Comparisons of mesiodistal and buccolingual crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico, and the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Nov;96(5):416-422.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBrown T, Margetts B, Townsend GC. Comparison of mesiodistal crown diameters of the deciduous and permanent teeth in Australian aboriginals. Aust Dent J. 1980 Feb;25(1):28-33.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSmith SS, Buschang PH, Watanabe E. Interarch tooth size relationships of 3 populations: «does Bolton’s analysis apply?» Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Feb;117(2):169-174es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGarn SM, Lewis AB, Swindler DR, Kerewsky RS. Genetic control of sexual dimorphism in tooth size. J. Dent. Res. 1967 Oct;46(5):963-972es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGarn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Sexual dimorphism in the buccolingual tooth diameter. J. Dent. Res. 1966 Dic;45(6):1819.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationEbeling CF, Ingervall B, Hedegård B, Lewin T. Secular changes in tooth size in Swedish men. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1973;31(3):141-147.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAl-Khateeb SN, Abu Alhaija ESJ. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample. Angle Orthod. 2006 May;76(3):459-465es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLegović M, Novosel A, Legović A. Regression equations for determining mesiodistal crown diameters of canines and premolars. Angle Orthod. 2003 Jun;73(3):314-318.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAdeyemi TA, Isiekwe MC. Comparing permanent tooth sizes (mesio-distal) of males and females in a Nigerian population. West Afr J Med. 2003 Sep;22(3):219-221es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPeng H, Wang X, Chen K. [The predication equation of the permanent canine and premolar crown]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2000 Feb;18(1):55-57.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSingh SP, Goyal A. Mesiodistal crown dimensions of the permanent dentition in North Indian children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006 Dic;24(4):192-196es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHashim HA, Al-Ghamdi S. Tooth width and arch dimensions in normal and malocclusion samples: an odontometric study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005 May 15;6(2):36-51.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMarín Manso GM, Olivia Perez M, Califa Mohammed, Abdullah Elza, Al Arshi M, Hisham W, et al. Validación de la ecuación de Tanaka-Johnston en una población de escolares yemenita. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2009;46(4):23-31.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBernabé E, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Tooth-width ratio discrepancies in a sample of Peruvian adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Mar;125(3):361-365es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNgom PI, Diagne F, Idrissi Ouedghiri D, Idrissi Ouedghiri H. [Comparative odontometric data between Moroccan and Senegalese]. Odontostomatol Trop. 2007 Mar;30(117):17-25es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMerz ML, Isaacson RJ, Germane N, Rubenstein LK. Tooth diameters and arch perimeters in a black and a white population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Jul;100(1):53-58es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationForsberg CM. Tooth size, spacing, and crowding in relation to eruption or impaction of third molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Jul;94(1):57-62es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationYuen KK, Tang EL, So LL. Relations between the mesiodistal crown diameters of the primary and permanent teeth of Hong Kong Chinese. Arch. Oral Biol. 1996 Ene;41(1):1-7es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHaralabakis NB, Sifakakis I, Papagrigorakis M, Papadakis G. The correlation of sexual dimorphism in tooth size and arch form. World J Orthod. 2006;7(3):254-260es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAltherr ER, Koroluk LD, Phillips C. Influence of sex and ethnic tooth-size differences on mixed-dentition space analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Sep;132(3):332-339es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAlvesalo L, Tammisalo E, Townsend G. Upper central incisor and canine tooth crown size in 47,XXY males. J. Dent. Res. 1991 Jul;70(7):1057-1060.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBlack GV. Descriptive anatomy of the human teeth. Philadelphia : Wilmington Dental. 1980.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSteigman S, Harari D, Kuraita-Landman S. Relationship between mesiodistal crown diameter of posterior deciduous and succedaneous teeth in israeli children. Eur J Orthod. 1982 Ago;4(3):219-227es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSteigman S, Harari D, Kuraita-Landman S. Relationship between mesiodistal crown diameter of posterior deciduous and succedaneous teeth in israeli children. Eur J Orthod. 1982 Ago;4(3):219-227es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationStaley RN, Kerber PE. A revision of the Hixon and Oldfather mixed-dentition prediction method. Am J Orthod. 1980 Sep;78(3):296-302es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLUNDSTROM A. Intermaxillary tooth width ratio and tooth alignment and occlusion. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1955 Feb;12(3-4):265-292.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationFlores-Mir C, Bernabé E, Camus C, Carhuayo MA, Major PW. Prediction of mesiodistal canine and premolar tooth width in a sample of Peruvian adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003 Ago;6(3):173-176es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationNANCE HN. The limitations of orthodontic treatment; mixed dentition diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod. 1947 Abr;33(4):177-223es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRadnzic D. Dental crowding and its relationship to mesiodistal crown diameters and arch dimensions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Jul;94(1):50-56es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMiethke RR, Behm-Menthel A. Correlations between lower incisor crowding and lower incisor position and lateral craniofacial morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Sep;94(3):231-239es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA, Memili B. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy and malocclusion: is there a relation? Angle Orthod. 2005 Mar;75(2):208-213es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysisand treatment of malocclusion. Am J Orthod. 1967;28:113-130es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationUysal T, Basciftci FA, Goyenc Y. New regression equations for mixed-dentition arch analysis in a Turkish sample with no Bolton tooth-size discrepancy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Mar;135(3):343-348es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationZilberman Y, Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E, Vardimon A. Estimation of mesiodistal width of permanent canines and premolars in early mixed dentition. J. Dent. Res. 1977 Ago;56(8):911-915es
dc.subjectPasivo incisivoes
dc.subjectDentición Permanentees
dc.subjectDentición deciduaes
dc.subjectTamaño dentales
dc.subjectEspacio de Leewayes
dc.subject.classificationTG 2010 ODO 44586es
dc.titleEstimación de la diferencia entre los diámetros mesiodistales de incisivos y molares deciduos con sus sucedáneos permanenteses
dc.typeTrabajos de grado - Pregradoes
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
2010_estimacion_diferencia_diametros.pdf
Tamaño:
775.88 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
4.23 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Odontología