Shape directional asymmetry in hindlimb pairs among calves (bos taurus)

dc.coverage.temporal12(559)es
dc.creatorSalamanca Carreño, Arcesio
dc.creatorPere Miquel, Parés-Casanova
dc.creatorOscar Mauricio, Vélez Terranova
dc.creatorNestor Ismael, Monroy Ochoa
dc.creator.mailarcesio.salamanca@campusucc.edu.coes
dc.creator.mailasaca_65@yahoo.eses
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-28T16:24:23Z
dc.date.available2022-02-28T16:24:23Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-23
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to determine paired asymmetries (right–left) in the autopods of bovine hindlimbs using geometric morphometry (GM). A total of 28 hindlimb right–left matched autopods belonging to healthy Brown Pyrenean calves were assessed. Dorsoplantar radiographs were obtained for each autopod. The bone shape was compared on right and left pairs by means of GM techniques, using a set of 15 landmarks. The results suggest that right and left distal limbs are, despite a perceived resemblance of symmetry, differently directionally developed in shape, with right hindlimbs tending to supinate (rotate outwards) and left hindlimbs tending to pronate (rotate inwards). This unevenness is probably related to the mediolateral forces’ contribution of each limb in carrying out the tasks of propulsion and control during walking, and/or a consequence of a laterality associated with a lateralized grazing posture. Our findings prompt a new reassessment of the function of each bovine hindlimb during standing and locomotion.es
dc.description.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001022903es
dc.description.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=es&user=EqGLQZUAAAAJes
dc.description.gruplachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/gruplac/jsp/visualiza/visualizagr.jsp?nro=00000000009387es
dc.description.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5416-5906es
dc.format.extent1-7es
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationSalamanca et al., 2022es
dc.identifier.issn2076-2615es
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani12050559es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/44059
dc.publisherFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiaes
dc.publisher.departmentVillavicencioes
dc.publisher.programMedicina veterinaria y zootecniaes
dc.relation.ispartofAnimalses
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/5/559es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.rights.licenseAtribución – No comercial – Sin Derivares
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSforza, C.; Michielon, G.; Fragnito, N.; Ferrario, V.F. Foot asymmetry in Healthy Adults: Elliptic fourier analysis of standardized footprints. J. Orthop. Res. 1998, 16, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Mancini, S.; Sally, S.L.; Gurnsey, R. Detection of symmetry and anti-symmetry. Vision Res. 2005, 45, 2145–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Graham, J.H.; Freeman, D.C.; Emlen, J.M. Antisymmetry, directional asymmetry, and dynamic morphogenesis. Genética 1993, 89, 121–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Auffray, J.C.; Debat, V.; Alibert, P. Shape asymmetry and developmental stability. In On Growth and Form: Spatio-Temporal Pattern Formation in Biology; Mark, A.J., Chaplain, G.D., McLachlan, J.C., Eds.; Singh; John Wiley and Sons Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 309–324. [Google Scholar] Costa, M.; Mateus, R.P.; Moura, M.O. Constant fluctuating asymmetry but not directional asymmetry along the geographic distribution of Drosophila antonietae (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Rev. Brasil. Entomol. 2015, 59, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Knierim, U.; Van Dongen, S.; Forkman, B.; Tuyttens, F.A.M.; Špinka, J.L.; Weissengruberg, G.E. Fluctuating asymmetry as an animal welfare indicator—Aa review of methodology and validity. Physiol. Behave 2007, 92, 398–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Habel, J.C.; Reuter, M.; Dress, C.; Pfaender, J. Does isolation affect phenotypic variability and fluctuating asymmetry in the endangered Red Apollo? J. Insect Conserv. 2012, 16, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Berns, C.M. The evolution of sexual dimorphism: Understanding mechanisms of sexual shape differences. In Sexual Dimorphism; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2013; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar] Ginot, S.; Agret, S.; Claude, J. Bite force performance, fluctuating asymmetry and antisymmetry in the mandible of inbred and outbred wild-derived strains of Mice (Mus musculus domesticus). Evolution. Biol. 2018, 45, 287–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Kubicka, A.M.; Lubiatowski, P.; Długosz, J.D.; Romanowski, L.; Piontek, J. Directional asymmetry of upper limbs in a medieval population from Poland: A combination of Linear and Geometric Morphometrics. Am. J. Human Biol. 2016, 28, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Carter, A.J.R.; Osborne, E.; Houle, D. Heritability of directional asymmetry in Drosophila melanogaster. Int. J. Evolut. Biol. 2009, 2009, 759159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] van der Tol, P.P.J.; Metz, J.H.M.; Noordhuizen-Stassen, E.N.; Back, W.; Braam, C.R.; Weijs, W.A. The pressure distribution under the bovine claw during square standing on a flat substrate. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 1476–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Mugglia, E.; Sauter-Louis, C.; Braun, U.; Nuss, K. Length asymmetry of the bovine digits. Veter. J. 2011, 188, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Parés-Casanova, P.M.; Castel-Mas, L.; Jones-Capdevila, K.N. Asymmetries of forelimb digits of young cattle. Veter. Sci. 2020, 7, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Parés-Casanova, P.M.; Jones Capdevila, K.N.; Castel Mas, L. Hindlimb lateral and medial acropodial series of cattle are uneven in form. Rev. Ciênc. Agroveter. 2020, 19, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Zelditch, M.L.; Swiderski, D.L.; Sheets, H.D.; Fink, W.L. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer; Elsevier Academic Press: Bostón, MA, USA, 2004; p. 416. [Google Scholar] Adams, D.C.; Rohlf, F.J.; Slice, D.E. A field comes of age: Geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix 2013, 24, 7–14. [Google Scholar] Rohlf, F.J. The Tps Series of Software. Hystrix Ital. J. Mamm. 2015, 26, 9–12. [Google Scholar] Rohlf, F.J. Digitalized Landmarks and Outlines. In Stony Brook: Department of Ecology and Evolution; State University of New York: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] Bookstein, F.L. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar] Klingenberg, C.P. Analyzing fluctuating asymmetry with Geometric Morphometrics: Concepts, methods and applications. Symmetry 2015, 7, 843–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Kubicka, A.M.; Nowaczewska, W.; Balzeau, A.; Piontek, J. Bilateral asymmetry of the humerus in Neandertals, Australian Aborigines and medieval humans. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2018, 167, 46–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Klingenberg, C.P. MorphoJ: An Integrated Software Package for Geometric Morphometrics. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and data analysis v. 2.17c. Palaeontol. Elect. 2001, 4, 1–229. [Google Scholar] Wilson, G.H.; Lesniak, K.; O’Connel, M. Skeletal forelimb measurements and hoof spread in relation to asymmetry in the bilateral forelimb. Equine Vet. J. 2009, 41, 238–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Shine, C.L.; Penberthy, S.; Robbins, C.T.; Nelson, O.L.; McGowan, C.P. Grizzly bear (Ursus Arctos Horribilis) locomotion: Gaits and ground reaction forces. J. Experim. Biol. 2015, 218, 3102–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Van Heel, M.C.V.; Kroekenstoel, A.M.; van Dierendonck, M.C.; van Weeren, P.R.; Back, W. Uneven feet in a foal may develop as a consequence of lateral grazing behaviour induced by conformation. Equine Vet. J. 2006, 38, 646–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]es
dc.subjectLateralidades
dc.subjectDominio de las extremidadeses
dc.subjectLocomociónes
dc.subjectSimetría emparejadaes
dc.subjectFuerzas mediolateraleses
dc.subjectRaza parda pirenaicaes
dc.subject.otherLateralityes
dc.subject.otherPyrenean Brown breedes
dc.subject.otherMediolateral forceses
dc.subject.otherMatched symmetryes
dc.subject.otherLocomotiones
dc.subject.otherLimb dominancees
dc.titleShape directional asymmetry in hindlimb pairs among calves (bos taurus)es
dc.typeArtículoes
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2022_shape_directional_asymmetry.pdf
Tamaño:
1.12 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
2022_shape_directional_asymmetry-FormatoLicenciaUso.pdf
Tamaño:
208.49 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
4.23 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: