Publicación: La posición de la corte constitucional sobre la efectividad de los derechos de las victimas Establecido en la ley 1448 de 2011, en lo referente a la reparación integral individual
Portada
Citas bibliográficas
Código QR
Director
Autor corporativo
Recolector de datos
Otros/Desconocido
Director audiovisual
Editor/Compilador
Filiación Institucional
Tipo de Material
Fecha
Cita bibliográfica
Título de serie/ reporte/ volumen/ colección
Es Parte de
Resumen
Following the signing of peace agreements with the FARC, violence in Colombia is expected to subside ostensibly, however,it cannot be overlooked that the ELN, The EPL and the criminal gangs that were born after the demobilization of the AUC, continue to delintend throughout the national territory,causing more and more victims of violence,this coupled with the fact that the current public policy of caring for victims of the armed conflict has failed to achieve socio- economic stabilizationnor the comprehensive reparation of the thousands of people included in the Single Register of Victims. Law 1448 of 2011 is the legal instrument that the state has used to date to care for and repair victims, however, this population continues to suffer the consequences of war while the system designed to attend them is collapsed so the guardianship action has become almost the only option that victims have victims to demand the effectiveness of their rights. The objective of this work is to build a line of jurisprudence that allows to identify the position of the Constitutional Court with regard to the effectiveness of the rights of victims established in Law 1448 of 2011, with regard to individual comprehensive reparation. In order to meet the objective initially set out, constitutional jurisprudence on individual comprehensive redress will be identified victims of armed conflict under Law 1448 of 2011, subsequently the arquimédica judgment will be defined as a starting point for the design of the jurisprudential line in order to finally set out the position that the Constitutional Court, has had over time, establishing what is the applicable jurisprudential precedent, comprehensive individual reparation scare for victims of armed conflict under Law 1448 of 2011. Since Constitutional Court jurisprudence is relatively recent on this issue, it is advisable to make a new line of jurisprudence once the corporate's jurisprudential development with respect to individual reparation what is the law 1448 of 2011 is more neat.