Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/15381
Exportar a:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.coverage.temporal17(1)es
dc.creatorBenavides Delgado, Jacqueline-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-03T14:36:17Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-03T14:36:17Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-01-
dc.identifier.issn1657-9089es
dc.identifier.uriDOI: 10.14483/16579089.11250es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/15381-
dc.descriptionEl objetivo de este artículo es analizar la influencia del lenguaje y la imaginación en el desarrollo de la teoría de la mente (Theory of Mind o ToM) en los niños. Inicia con la definición del concepto y la ex- posición de las diferentes teorías que han intentado explicar dicho desarrollo en los niños. El artículo aborda estudios que relacionan la ToM con la imaginación y con el lenguaje pragmático. Con respecto a la imaginación, se hace un recorrido especial por los estudios que involucran a los niños con amigos imaginarios y su relación con el mundo social. En relación con el lenguaje pragmático, se destaca la in- fluencia de las conversaciones familiares con contenido mental para el desarrollo de la ToM. Por último, el artículo muestra la importancia de los procesos simbólicos en el desarrollo de la ToM en los niños y aporta, desde su conclusión, elementos para fomentar su desarrollo.es
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this article is to analyse the influence of language and imagination on the development of Theory of Mind (ToM) in children. Starting with the definition of the concept and the exposure of the different theories that have tried to explain this development in children. The article discusses studies that relate the ToM with the imagination and the language pragmatic. With regard to the imagination, it takes a special tour of the studies that involve children with imaginary friends and their relationship with the social world. In relation to pragmatic language, the influence of family conversations with mental content for the development of the ToM is highlighted. Respecting pragmatic language, the influence of family conversations with mental content for the development of ToM is highlighted. Finally, the article shows the importance of the symbolic processes in the development of the ToM in the children and contributes, since its conclusion, elements to encourage its development.es
dc.format.extent90-99es
dc.publisherUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Psicología, Bogotáes
dc.relation.ispartofInfancia imágeneses
dc.subjectTeoría de la mentees
dc.subjectImaginaciónes
dc.subjectAmigos imaginarioses
dc.subjectLenguaje pragmáticoes
dc.subjectConversaciones familiareses
dc.subject.otherTheory of mindes
dc.subject.otherImaginationes
dc.subject.otherImaginary friendses
dc.subject.otherPragmatic languagees
dc.subject.otherFamiliar conversationses
dc.titleHabilidades pragmáticas, imaginación y comprensión de los estados mentales en los niñoses
dc.rights.licenseAtribuciónes
dc.publisher.departmentBogotáes
dc.publisher.programPsicologíaes
dc.type.spaArtículoes
dc.creator.mailjaqueline.benavidesd@campusucc.edu.coes
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBenavides Delgado, J. (2018). Habilidades pragmáticas, imaginación y comprensión de los estados mentales en los niños. Infancias Imágenes, 17 (1), 90-99.es
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.publisher.editorFlor Alba Santamaría Valeroes
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAmes, L. B. y Learned, J. (1946). Imaginary companions and related phenomena. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 69, 147-167. https://doi.org/10. 1080/08856559.1946.10533385es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAstington, A. (1998). El descubrimiento infantil de la mente. Madrid: Morata.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAstington, A. y Jenkins, J. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1311-1320. https://doi. org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.5.1311es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationAstington, A. y Baird, J. (2005). Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind. Oxford: Oxford Scholar. https://doi.org/10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780195159912.001.0001es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationBrinthaupt, T. M. y Dove, C. T. (2012). Differences in self-talk frequency as a function of age, only-child, and imaginary childhood companion status. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 326-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jrp.2012.03.003es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCarpendale, J. y Lewis, C. (2006). How Children Develop Social Understanding. Malden (Massachusetts): Blackwell Publishing.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationCicchetti, D., Rogosch, F. A., Maughan, A., Toth, S. L. y Bruce, J. (2003). False belief understanding in maltreated children. Development Psychopathology, 15(4), 1067-91. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0954579403000440es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDavis, P., Meins, E. y Fernythough, C. (2011). Selfknowledge in childhood: Relations with children’s imaginary companions and understanding of mind. British Journal of Development Psychology, 29(3), 680-686. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02038.xes
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDe Villiers, P. (2005). The role of language in theory of mind development: What deaf children tell us. En J. W. Astington y J. A. Baird, Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind (pp. 266-297). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780195159912.003.0013es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDunn, J., Bretherton, I. y Munn, P. (1987). Conversations about feeling states between mothers and their young children. Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 132-139. https://doi. org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.1.132es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationDunn, J., Brown, J., Slomkowski, C., Tesla, C. y Youngblade, L. (1991). Young children’s understanding of other people’s feelings and belief: Individual difference and their antecedents. Child Development, 62, 1352-1366. https://doi. org/10.2307/1130811es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGleason, T. (2002). Social provisions of real and imaginary relationships in early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 979-992. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.979es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationGleason, T., Sebanc, A. y Hartup, W. (2000). Imaginary companions of preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 36(4), 419-428. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.4.419es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHarris, P. (1992). From simulation to folk psychology: The case for development. Mind and Language, 7(1), 120-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1992.tb00201.xes
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHarter, S. y Chao, C. (1992). The role of competence in children’s creation of imaginary friends. Merill-Palmer Quartely, 38(3), 350-363es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHoff, E. (2005). Language Development. Nueva York: Cenage Learning.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHoneycutt, J., Pecchioni, L., Keaton, A.S y Pence, M. (2011). Developmental implications of mental imagery in children. Journal Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 31(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.2190/IC.31.1-2.hes
dc.source.bibliographicCitationHurlock, E. y Burstein, W. (1932). The imaginary playmate. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 41, 380-392.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationJohnson, C. (1988). Theory of mind and the structure of conscious experience. En J. Astington, P. Harris y D. Olson eds. Developing Theories of Mind (pp. 47-63). Oxford: Cambridge University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLeBar, M. (2001). Simulation, theory, and emotion. Philosophical Psychology, 14(4), 424-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080120088094es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationLeslei, A. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of Theory of Mind. Psychological Review, 94(4), 412-426. https://doi. org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.412es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationManosevitz, M., Fling, S. y Prentice, N. (1977). Imaginary companions in young children: Relationships with intelligence, creativity and waiting ability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 18, 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1977.tb00418.xes
dc.source.bibliographicCitationManosevitz, M., Prentice, N. y Wilson, F. (1973). Individual and family correlates of imaginary companions in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 8, 72-79. https://doi. org/10.1037/h0033834es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMendoza, E. y López, P. (2004). Consideraciones sobre el desarrollo de la teoría de la mente (TdM) y del lenguaje. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 57(1), 49-67.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationMiller, C. (2006). Developmental relationships between language and the theory of mind. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(2), 142-153. https://doi. org/10.1044/1058-0360(2006/014)es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationPremack, D. y Woodruff, G. (1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral. Brain Sci, 1, 515-526. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0140525X00076512es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRuffman, T., Perner, J. y Parkin, L. (1999). How parenting style affects false belief. Social Development, 8(3), 395-411. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-9507.00103es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationRuffman, T., Slade, L. y Crowe, E. (2002). The relation between children’s and mother's mental state language and theory-of-mind understanding. Child Development, 73(3), 734-751. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00435es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSinger, D. G. y Singer, J. L. (1992). The house of makebelieve. Cambridge: Harvard University Presses
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSomers, J. U. y Yawkey, T. D. (1984). Imaginary play companions: Contributions of creative and intellectual abilities of young children. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 18(2), 77-89. https://doi. org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1984.tb00370.xes
dc.source.bibliographicCitationSvendsen, M. (1934). Children’s Imaginary Companions. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 32, 985-999. https://doi.org/10.1001/ archneurpsyc.1934.02250110073006es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTaylor, M. (1999). Imaginary Companions and the Children Who Create Them. Oxford: Oxford University Press.es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTaylor, M. y Carlson, S. (1997). The relation between individual difference in fantasy and the Theory of Mind. Child Development, 68, 436- 455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131670es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTaylor, M., Cartwright, B. y Carlson, S. (1993). A developmental investigation of children’s imaginary companions. Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 276-285. https://doi. org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.2.276es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTaylor, M., Hodges, S. D. y Kohanyi, A. (2003). The illusion of independent agency: Do adult fiction writers experience their characters as having minds of their own? Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 22, 361-380. https://doi. org/10.2190/FTG3-Q9T0-7U26-5Q5Xes
dc.source.bibliographicCitationTaylor, M., Hullette, A. y Dishion, T. (2010). Longitudinal outcome of young high risk adolescent with imaginary companions. Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1632-1636. https://doi. org/10.1037/a0019815es
dc.source.bibliographicCitationWimmer, H., y Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103-128. https://doi. org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5es
dc.description.cvlachttps://scienti.colciencias.gov.co/cvlac/EnRecursoHumano/inicio.does
dc.description.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8889-4317es
dc.description.gruplacBOULOMAIes
dc.description.googlescholarhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=mVGvlFMAAAAJ&hl=eses
Appears in Collections:Psicología

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2018_habilidades_pragmaticas.pdfArtículo239.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
2019_habilidades_pragmaticas-LicenciaUso.pdfLicencia de uso970.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.